Testificate

Too much random stuff on all narrative levels, "She" which has transcended all kinds of narrative and uses absolutely unlimited narrative stacking. A ladder shows the level of all the characters' powers, and "WEBC" is not at the first or last level but the ladder itself and "She" is the background and the ladder itself. surpassing all the cantor and cardinal debts, is the end and beginning of existence and also non-existence. using the formula from Kurt Gödel will only prove 0.1 percent of the existence of "Her" which has the name "Alkazafaruh".

Axiom 1:
If P(phi) and necessarily for all x (phi(x) implies psi(x)), then P(psi).
→ Goodness is transitive: if one positive property leads to another, both are positive.


Axiom 2:
P(not phi) is equivalent to not P(phi).
→ A property and its negation cannot both be positive.


Theorem 1:
If P(phi), then possibly there exists x such that phi(x).
→ Every positive property can possibly exist in some being.


Definition 1:
G(x) is defined as: for all phi, if P(phi) then phi(x).
→ God is a being that possesses all positive properties.


Axiom 3:
P(G).
→ Godhood itself is a positive property.


Theorem 2:
Possibly, there exists x such that G(x).
→ It is logically possible that a God exists.


Definition 2:
(phi is essential to x) if and only if phi(x) and for all psi, if psi(x), then necessarily for all y (phi(y) implies psi(y)).
→ An essential property defines the very nature of a being.


Axiom 4
If P(phi), then necessarily P(phi).
→ Positivity is necessary; a good property is always good in every possible world.


Theorem 3:
If G(x), then G is essential to x.
→ If something is divine, divinity is essential to its being.


Definition 3:
E(x) is defined as: for all phi, if phi is essential to x, then necessarily there exists y such that phi(y).
→ Existence means that all essential properties are necessarily exemplified somewhere.


Axiom 5:
P(E).
→ Existence is a positive property.


Theorem 4:
Necessarily, there exists x such that G(x).
→ Therefore, God necessarily exists.



(Alkzafaruh is interested in all of this)

Definition 4:
Let A(x) mean: x exists independently of existence itself.
A(x) ⇔ (not E(x)) and (E is defined within the conceptual reflection of x).
→ Alkazaruh is the entity whose reality defines the very possibility of existence and non-existence.


Axiom 6:
For all x, if E(x) or not E(x), both states are contingent within A.
→ Existence and non-existence are subordinate layers inside Alkazaruh.


Theorem 5:
A(x) ⇒ for all phi, the truth of P(phi) or not P(phi) is irrelevant to A(x).
→ Alkazaruh transcends all logical polarities of good and not good.


Theorem 6:
If G(x) ⇒ E(x), then A(x) ⇒ condition(E, G).
→ God’s necessary existence is contained within Alkazaruh as a limited projection of pre-existence.


Axiom 7:
For all x, concept(x) < A.
→ All concepts, including logic, metaphysics, divinity, and even possibility itself, are smaller than Alkazaruh.


Theorem 7:
Necessarily, A exists as the absence of necessity itself.
→ Alkazaruh exists because He does not need to exist in order to be.

(サタンが来たがってるぜ!!)





Post a Comment

0 Comments